I have so much to comment on, yet, with that most recent Department of Homeland Security brief that was published onto the web one day before the national Tea Parties, I have become more reticent to post anything online. After all, I am now a Right Wing Extremist. That report neatly lumped me into groups such as Neo-Nazis, WASP, and all those other radicals I detest. How quaint.
I have come to a conclusion about Obama. I know, I was going to give him a chance, as stated in a previous post, and I did. We've seen almost 100 days of him parading around, and to put it mildly, he's vigorously disgusted me. Yes, that makes me a racist now, too.
Ask yourself this; how much do you actually know about the current president? If you're like 90% of the rest of the population, then your response should be "little to nothing." Does that concern you, a bit? It should. First, it tells you that the news agencies probably didn't do a good job with their investigative journalism. Based on my own research, which may not be accurate because of the lacking details (i.e., no facts to base information on) I believe that Obama is a Muslim Communist. Yeah, I know, sounds completely loony. I understand that. I was aghast with my conclusion as well. So let's see what we do have, and you can make your own judgment call...
I'm not even going to go over whether he was actually born in the US. Although if you are curious about that issue, there is currently a case going to the Supreme Court with that argument in mind. 120 soldiers have attached their name to this case because they question his right to be president. Coincidently, 4 people say they saw his birth -- they all live in Kenya and are under a gag order by the government which is controlled by... Obama's cousin.
Obama was born to Stanley Ann Dunham (yes, that's her real name) who was the daughter of well known communists who originally resided in the mid-west until moving to Seattle, and finally, Hawaii. Obama's father is proportedly Barak Hussien Obama, Sr., a Muslim on an exchange program from Kenya, which at this point is a British controlled providence. Both Stanley Ann and Obama Sr. go to the same university and I think we can guess what happens thereafter.
Obama's mother leaves him to be raised by her parents as she goes off to pursue college back in Washington and she occasionally sees him during his younger years. Eventually, she marries Lolo Soetoro, a man from Indonesia who adopts Barak and he attends a Wahhabi Muslim school funded by Saudi Arabia. One of the few things we have on Obama is a report card from that school which lists his religion as "Islam." Subsequently, the curriculum includes studying the Koran and learning Arabic, which he does well.
The marriage breaks apart, Barak returns to Hawaii and once again lives with his grandparents, plays basketball and does a lot of drugs, seriously. He graduates from high school and heads to Occidental college. One thing that really bothers me, especially for someone who promised "transparency and openness" is the overt lack of documentation from Obama. Or in other words, we have no transcripts from Occidental, Comumbia or Harvard Law on this guy, which are the colleges he attended. But there is an underlying recurrance; in all three colleges, his roommates were Muslim exchange students. So what is he hiding here?
When the media attacked Bush in 2004 as 'not being an intellectual', in the process, they found out that Kerry got worse grades than Bush at their respective Ivy League schools. Similarly, they have said that Obama is smart and articulate, yet, no records to verify this at all...
Before Obama heads to Harvard Law, he works in Chicago as a "community organizer" and work in conjunction with ACORN. This is also where he mets Bill Ayers for the first time. Bill Ayers being the communist heading the Weather Underground movement, culpable for bombing several places throughout the US and thus spent time in hiding for several years. Perhaps Bill convinced him to go into law, but somehow, Obama gets into Harvard Law, which requires a 98% on the LSAT and a 3.8 GPA, plus, lots of money. After a $20 million dollar donation by the Saudi Government to Harvard, Obama ... gets in.
After Harvard, Obama joins a local law firm in Chicago, but apparently spends most of his time writing his book, Dreams of my Father -- never sets foot into a court room, never really litigates a case at all. But he does get involved with politics. As a matter of fact, he tries for the State Senate seat on the "New Party" ticket. That new party was in fact, a social democratic party. Sounds nice, but it's just another way for saying "communist." Now why would he run on that party? Birds of the feather, flock together.
He runs on the New Party ticket twice, with all other candidates either being removed on technicalities, or, they decide not to run any more. Strange? Sure, especially since it happened two times in a row. The next time he's running as a democrat. Why the change? Greener pastures, I presume. But what did he do in the Senate? How about this; he proposed November 1st as Muslim Community Day for Illinois. How about supporting a law requiring food manufacturers to prepare food according to [Muslim] Shariah law? And then a long list of bills that are pro-abortion, gun control, the usual suspects.
From the State Senate, as we all know, he goes into the US Senate and is voted one of the top liberal Senators on the floor. Then, somehow, this junior senator with little experience but a golden smile (and I do like his smile), defeats all these veterans of politics and is now the most powerful man in the world, giving out apologies like Halloween candy, and bowing to the King of a nation that funded his early childhood education. Now, what does it mean when you bow and it is not recipricated? Even King Abdullah said in 2005 that only his slaves and harems bow to him. What message was Obama giving to the King...
Anyway, there is so much more on this guy that you will not believe your eyes. If you have the time, and are seriously interested in the future of this nation, then read this. It is very long, but the future is written in history, and he has a lot to answer for already.
My 4 loyal readers, I am serious when I say that I am hesitant to write any more online. Conservative Americans are the next target because we pose the biggest threat to his presidency -- not outside foes that he's been placating over the past 2 months. You're going to see more "change" in this country over the next 52 weeks than we've seen in 52 years. Obama is a charlatan, and his colors of tyranny will shine through.
I said he was a Muslim Communist, but those two ideologies cannot coexist. So my belief is that Obama's true goal is to undermine the US either using one or the other. Once the US world police ceases to exist, you can probably say good bye to South Korea, Taiwan, Israel, the Baltic States, and any other country that's been waiting for the boy scouts to disappear. I believe Obama is that man who will deliver that kind of "hope and change."
Sorry if I sound like a right wing extremist. But do your home work, and tell me what you find. Convince me otherwise, I dare you.
Monday, April 20, 2009
Saturday, April 4, 2009
"Nobody died when Clinton lied"
I love bumper stickers. True, I am too much of a perfectionist to slap one on my car -- it just makes the car look less nice -- but I certainly enjoy reading other people's ugly car decals. I saw one today that said, "Stop global whining!" I thought it was well delivered.
The one that I'd like to comment on is found in the title of this post. It comes from the W. presidency and relates to the Iraq war, and that Bush supposedly lied to get us into war. Now, there are a plethora of arguments regarding that assumption, and I've briefly lit upon them before in a previous post, but you can find even more reasons here. However, that's not the reason I am making this post. In fact, I intend to prove that people did die due to Clinton's lie, albeit in a roundabout sort of way.
Al Qaeda (i.e., meaning, 'the base') have been officially around since 1988, causing problems for lots of people in many countries. Sadly, we helped support the mujaheddin fighters in Afghanistan to defeat the Russians who afterwards would then build the foundation for the Al Qaeda network. Osama bin Ladin took issue with the US once we laid foot in Saudi Arabi in an effort to defeat Iraq the first time. The "land of two mosques" (Medina and Mecca) was defiled by infidels when we sought to help Kuwait. Yeah, I know, it's just a bunch of sand.
Anyway, in the 1990s, under President Clinton's 2 consecutive terms in office, the Al Qaeda network attacked us several times. The first major attack is one we rarely hear about any more; the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. According to some, the tactic they used (a cubetruck full of explosives) was a CIA style idea which, again, we taught them. It killed 6 people, injured over a thousand and caused +$300 million in damages. The intent was to force one tower to collapse into another and potentially kill hundreds of thousands of people. Thankfully, it didn't happen.
Look at it this way; a group of 200-300 operatives, in less than 4 years, was able to get into the US, buy nearly a ton of explosives, and execute a decent plan of attack. Did we retaliate? Well, we prosecuted those involved, and deported some (one of which was acquited in Jordan and released), but where is the Special Forces group going into the terrorist training camp and eliminating subjects? Right, we wouldn't hear about that. Still, in 1998, Al Qaeda has the gall to bomb us again, twice. So if we did punish them at all, it certainly didn't bat an eye for them.
Two US Embassys in Tanzania and Kenya are blown to smithereens in 1998, and 300 people die in that process. We did respond with cruise missiles, but we managed to bomb a pharmacuetical facility which made 50% of the medicine for Sudan. After an investigation, it was determined that our intelligence was "faulty." An after report stated our efforts did not deter the Al Qaeda network. If anything, blowing up a country's medical supplies may have bolstered recruits.
But in 1998, the US is busy with allegations towards President Clinton and a certain intern. Words like "impeachment" and "what the definition of 'is,' is?" were floating around. Suspected cigars and stained dresses is the focus of the media of the Lewinski scandal (also of note, Jennifer Flowers and Paula Jones). Here's my main crux; Senator John Glenn was the first American in space back in the 1960s. Later he gets into politics and becomes a US Senator from Ohio in 1974. He also happens to be heading the Senate Committee in charge of the investigations against the president. Remember what happens then? At 77 years old, NASA decides to send him back into space. Why? Even gets a standing ovation during a State of the Union address by Bill Clinton for being the "oldest person going into space." And Bill Clinton retains his position despite perjury and (obviously) tarnishing the office of the presidency. Sure, sure, Nixon, Andrew Johnson, etc. But Nixon had the dignity to resign! (And the law used against Andrew Johnson was deemed unconstitutional later.)
Yemen, July of 2000 we have a Navy ship, the USS Cole refueling at a local port. Then, 2 suicide bombers ram into the side of the ship, causing a 40 x 60 foot hole and killing 17 sailors in the process, wounding even more. Here's what Bill Clinton said, "If, as it now appears, this was an act of terrorism, it was a despicable and cowardly act. We will find out who was responsible and hold them accountable". But nothing happened. Actually, it wasn't until President Bush's start that they even definitively said that it was actually Al Qaeda, even though Al Qaeda claimed it.
A little over a year later, the twin towers actually do come down, as Al Qaeda had planned back in 1993. In 1996, there was a bombing of the Khobar tower in Saudi Arabia that killed 19 servicemen from the US. Images of Osama bin Laden being congratulated were circulating around shortly thereafter, so the connection leading up to 9/11 would have been, at least from my perspective, a little obvious. Is it so obvious now that we've been in Afghanistan and Iraq? No, we've really put a beating on them. However, after reading Mark Steyn's book America Alone, maybe not.
Nonetheless, if perhaps had John Glenn not been bought out, and had he and others done their jobs, we could have moved on quicker from the impeachment and focused on pending issues such as the growing strength of the Al Qaeda. Maybe if Clinton hadn't cut the Department of Defense to 3% of the GDP, we would have been more astute. And a hundred more maybe's and if's as well. The point is that because of the long and drawn out political scandal, if Clinton hadn't lied about every little detail before the truth was finally brought forth, maybe we could have saved lives, maybe even a war or two, and could have been in a different place altogether. This is, of course, just conjecture. But it would be nice to know...
The one that I'd like to comment on is found in the title of this post. It comes from the W. presidency and relates to the Iraq war, and that Bush supposedly lied to get us into war. Now, there are a plethora of arguments regarding that assumption, and I've briefly lit upon them before in a previous post, but you can find even more reasons here. However, that's not the reason I am making this post. In fact, I intend to prove that people did die due to Clinton's lie, albeit in a roundabout sort of way.
Al Qaeda (i.e., meaning, 'the base') have been officially around since 1988, causing problems for lots of people in many countries. Sadly, we helped support the mujaheddin fighters in Afghanistan to defeat the Russians who afterwards would then build the foundation for the Al Qaeda network. Osama bin Ladin took issue with the US once we laid foot in Saudi Arabi in an effort to defeat Iraq the first time. The "land of two mosques" (Medina and Mecca) was defiled by infidels when we sought to help Kuwait. Yeah, I know, it's just a bunch of sand.
Anyway, in the 1990s, under President Clinton's 2 consecutive terms in office, the Al Qaeda network attacked us several times. The first major attack is one we rarely hear about any more; the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. According to some, the tactic they used (a cubetruck full of explosives) was a CIA style idea which, again, we taught them. It killed 6 people, injured over a thousand and caused +$300 million in damages. The intent was to force one tower to collapse into another and potentially kill hundreds of thousands of people. Thankfully, it didn't happen.
Look at it this way; a group of 200-300 operatives, in less than 4 years, was able to get into the US, buy nearly a ton of explosives, and execute a decent plan of attack. Did we retaliate? Well, we prosecuted those involved, and deported some (one of which was acquited in Jordan and released), but where is the Special Forces group going into the terrorist training camp and eliminating subjects? Right, we wouldn't hear about that. Still, in 1998, Al Qaeda has the gall to bomb us again, twice. So if we did punish them at all, it certainly didn't bat an eye for them.
Two US Embassys in Tanzania and Kenya are blown to smithereens in 1998, and 300 people die in that process. We did respond with cruise missiles, but we managed to bomb a pharmacuetical facility which made 50% of the medicine for Sudan. After an investigation, it was determined that our intelligence was "faulty." An after report stated our efforts did not deter the Al Qaeda network. If anything, blowing up a country's medical supplies may have bolstered recruits.
But in 1998, the US is busy with allegations towards President Clinton and a certain intern. Words like "impeachment" and "what the definition of 'is,' is?" were floating around. Suspected cigars and stained dresses is the focus of the media of the Lewinski scandal (also of note, Jennifer Flowers and Paula Jones). Here's my main crux; Senator John Glenn was the first American in space back in the 1960s. Later he gets into politics and becomes a US Senator from Ohio in 1974. He also happens to be heading the Senate Committee in charge of the investigations against the president. Remember what happens then? At 77 years old, NASA decides to send him back into space. Why? Even gets a standing ovation during a State of the Union address by Bill Clinton for being the "oldest person going into space." And Bill Clinton retains his position despite perjury and (obviously) tarnishing the office of the presidency. Sure, sure, Nixon, Andrew Johnson, etc. But Nixon had the dignity to resign! (And the law used against Andrew Johnson was deemed unconstitutional later.)
Yemen, July of 2000 we have a Navy ship, the USS Cole refueling at a local port. Then, 2 suicide bombers ram into the side of the ship, causing a 40 x 60 foot hole and killing 17 sailors in the process, wounding even more. Here's what Bill Clinton said, "If, as it now appears, this was an act of terrorism, it was a despicable and cowardly act. We will find out who was responsible and hold them accountable". But nothing happened. Actually, it wasn't until President Bush's start that they even definitively said that it was actually Al Qaeda, even though Al Qaeda claimed it.
A little over a year later, the twin towers actually do come down, as Al Qaeda had planned back in 1993. In 1996, there was a bombing of the Khobar tower in Saudi Arabia that killed 19 servicemen from the US. Images of Osama bin Laden being congratulated were circulating around shortly thereafter, so the connection leading up to 9/11 would have been, at least from my perspective, a little obvious. Is it so obvious now that we've been in Afghanistan and Iraq? No, we've really put a beating on them. However, after reading Mark Steyn's book America Alone, maybe not.
Nonetheless, if perhaps had John Glenn not been bought out, and had he and others done their jobs, we could have moved on quicker from the impeachment and focused on pending issues such as the growing strength of the Al Qaeda. Maybe if Clinton hadn't cut the Department of Defense to 3% of the GDP, we would have been more astute. And a hundred more maybe's and if's as well. The point is that because of the long and drawn out political scandal, if Clinton hadn't lied about every little detail before the truth was finally brought forth, maybe we could have saved lives, maybe even a war or two, and could have been in a different place altogether. This is, of course, just conjecture. But it would be nice to know...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)