Thursday, January 22, 2009

Changing of the Guard

In case you missed it due to some lucky coma (and even then your excuse is pretty weak), earlier this week there was a momentous power exchange between the quixotic political parties: the Presidency. The poster boy for the Democrats took office, floundering over the oath a little, but still official. Mr Obama is everywhere in my news. We're just one bored journalist's dilemma from knowing Mr Obama's routine bowel movements, if he has any.

I don't have anything in particular against Mr Obama per se. Originally, I thought he was a decent fellow, but clearly a long-shot from getting into the white house based upon the fact he was a one-term junior senator with practically no political experience. And we didn't really know him very well. I lumped him into the same category as Fred Thompson, the actor who ran on the Republican ticket.

Yet somehow, this no-name low-on-the-totem pole senator picked up momentum and defeated Hillary Clinton, which is impossible. And I mean that. Even when Clinton lead Obama by double digits in state polls, he still beat her, sometimes handily. It is highly questionable to me, but thankfully the media swept by those issues and fueled the mania. That mania banked on "Change" even though there was no real difference between Hillary's and Barak's change -- it actually came down to a popularity contest in the end. In this case, always bet on black.

Questions aside, I do recognize that even the best republican would have lost the election. It wasn't that Bush buried all hope for republicans; it was the media. Bush did what he thought was morally right for the country. Same thing Lincoln did, coincidentally. Sure, there is the black mark of Iraq - but let's face it: we all bought into it. We were in the wake of 9/11, the CIA comes out with a report that says WMDs in Iraq, other countries agree, and Sadam had ousted the UN inspectors several months before they were supposed to leave. In short, our intelligence community let us down, but the media pegged one fall guy specifically. Unless, of course, Iraq did have some WMDs and shipped them out. Meh, wasteful thinking.

The other sorta black mark is Hurricane Katrina, which is not Bush's fault unless he does control the weather. But, New Orleans was aware of the dangers. In a poll taken 3 months prior, 37% of citizens said they wouldn't abandon New Orleans if a hurrican ever came. Lo and behold, guess what happened? People suffered. Bush believed FEMA could handle it. They failed. Not him. He came a few days late, but what could he do? His FEMA organization was in shambles.

I'm not here to wipe Bush's slate clean, but he was unfairly targeted, villianized, crucified, and finally, called the "worst president ever" which is crap.

So now we have Obama, and my premilinary judgment is muddled. I want to think that he will be able to fix the economy (again, a problem brewing since Carter's era) and make things all nice and peachy. He presumptuously aligns himself with Lincoln, the media eat it up, and I hear about it nearly 24/7. Let me put it this way; he is not Lincoln by any means. And history will judge Obama accordingly. Lincoln was extremely unpopular during his day -- after all, he presided over our bloodiest moments.

If I were the draw parallels for Mr Obama, I'd say he's closer to Franklin D. Roosevelt. A decent president who saved the economy by going into war. Seriously, stock market crashed in October in 1929, he was elected in 1932, and we remained in a depression for almost 10 years until WWII. See, Mr Obama is already proposing what FDR did, more taxes and stimulus options. How does that help consumer confidence? More taxes, great. Sure, it'll make way for more government jobs, I understand. At my cost, though.

Anyway, here's what I'll do. I admit that I do not trust Mr Obama. He came out of no-where, I don't know his policies (aside from overt liberal agenda), and I fear that his long-term fixes. In short (heh, hardly), the old adage that the constitution will hang by a thread is now well on it's way to being true. The American Way, coupled with the American Dream, will become a nice piece of history. Well, it'll be re-written to look selfish. We are working towards socialism now. Gah! Side tangent -- this whole freakin' post is side-tangent upon side-tangent.

Okay, again, I'll respect the office of the president, which more than I can say for the rest of the country while Bush was in office. I'll give Obama the chance to succeed and try not to be cynical... yet. There have been good Democratic presidents as well as bad ones. But, I just feel that yellow journalism will forever slander any good republican candidate, and that this country is more one-sided than ever. Actually, I know for a fact: there are now 17 million more democrats than republicans. Super. Who needs bipartisan when you have a majority? Even Mickey Mouse is probably a democrat now. Filthy little rat.

6 comments:

MindySue said...

LOVED it! an amazing post. i pretty much completely agree with every word. especially what you said about bush and certain things being beyond his control.

as for obama.

we'll see. but i'm worried.

Connie Christensen said...

I like your view on this topic. Pretty much matches mine too. Signed, Your Mother-in-Law

Katie said...

This was a fun post to read. Interesting times. I have been trying to think of a funny, clever, or maybe even snarky comment to make....but it just isn't coming to me. I'm just gonna go have me a cupcake.

Allanna said...

You had me at the "one bored journalist" comment. And, if that bored journalist DID report it, you'd know that s/he'd proclaim that it didn't stink. :P

I'm willing to give him a chance.
I only hope and pray that he does a good job.

I also agree that Bush was blamed for a lot of things beyond his control. (I'm not saying that he was perfect. I'm still bitter about NCLB's being passed, since if we want teachers to do better, why don't we, idk, actually PAY them enough to not have to pay for so much of their classroom stuff out of pocket? Or something?)

Still, I kinda liked W. At the very least, he wasn't a complete horndog who shamed our nation by mixing business with complete immorality. (Yeah, we couldn't tell who I'm thinking of there, huh?)

Seriously, you need to blog more often, since I enjoy reading your posts so much. ^_^

The Hero said...

Clearly I need to reread my posts before publishing them. It makes a little more sense now. Just barely...

-Me

Kate the Great said...

Well, sadly, I don't agree with you on most of what you said; being a democrat (my husband calls me a socialist, but that's a bit much)
but it was still very interesting and fun to read.

Even I don't want to know about what the President does in his bathroom.